Home/India market entry/Your first permanent India hire
Guide · India market entry
When to hire your first permanent India marketing leader
Too early and you cannot define the role. Too late and you have capped the business. The triggers are clearer than most companies realise.
Every successful fractional or interim arrangement should end with this question, and answering it honestly is part of the job. A consultant who never recommends a permanent hire is protecting their retainer rather than the client's business.
The timing question is usually posed as one of affordability, which is the least useful frame. The better questions are whether the role can yet be defined precisely, and whether the volume and continuity of work genuinely require a full-time person.
The triggers that indicate readiness
- You can write the role specification from experience — not from a template. If you cannot describe precisely what this person will do in their first six months, you are not ready and the hire will drift.
- The work is continuous rather than project-shaped — daily decisions, ongoing team or vendor management, and constant customer or channel contact justify full time. Periodic strategic input does not.
- There is a team or vendor set to lead — a marketing leader with nobody to lead and nothing to allocate is an expensive individual contributor.
- Revenue supports the cost without distorting priorities — a senior India marketing salary plus costs against thin revenue creates pressure for short-term activity that damages the position you have built.
- The market has stabilised enough to plan against — hiring into genuine strategic uncertainty means the person you hire may not be the person the settled strategy requires.
The hiring errors that recur
The most common is hiring a marketing communications person when the role requires a commercial marketing leader. Indian marketing hiring pools are deep in communications, digital and brand execution, and thinner in people who have owned a number, managed a channel and worked with an overseas parent. The CV that looks impressive may be impressive at something you do not need.
The second is under-levelling to save cost. A mid-level hire in a role requiring senior judgement produces a person who executes competently and escalates every decision to a headquarters that lacks local context — which reproduces the original problem at additional expense.
The third is hiring without a clear decision-rights framework. An India marketing leader reporting to an overseas parent needs explicit clarity on what they decide, what they recommend and what they escalate. Without it, either they are paralysed or headquarters is surprised.
The fourth is timing the search badly. Senior marketing hiring in India takes three to six months for the right person, longer where the brand is unknown locally. Starting the search when the need becomes urgent guarantees a compromise.
Handing over from a fractional arrangement
A good handover starts months before the hire arrives. The role specification should be written from what the fractional arrangement actually revealed the job to be. The plans, systems, vendor relationships and channel contacts should be documented as they are built rather than reconstructed at the end. And the honest assessment of each team member, each vendor and each channel partner should be written down.
A short overlap — typically four to eight weeks of reducing involvement — lets the incoming leader inherit relationships rather than contact lists. It also gives them somebody to ask, which shortens their ramp considerably.
This is the correct ending for a fractional engagement, not a failure of one. An arrangement that makes itself unnecessary has done the job.
Questions
What overseas teams ask
Should we hire an Indian national or send someone from headquarters?
For a marketing leadership role, an Indian national with local market knowledge almost always outperforms an expatriate posting, and at a fraction of the cost. Expatriate placements make more sense where the primary requirement is representing headquarters culture and standards rather than understanding the local market.
What should we pay?
It varies substantially by city, sector and seniority, and the reliable approach is a market benchmark at the point of hiring rather than a figure from a general survey. What is worth stating is that under-paying for this specific role is a false economy, because the gap between a competent India marketing leader and an excellent one shows up directly in revenue.
Can the fractional arrangement continue alongside a permanent hire?
Briefly, during handover, and occasionally as light advisory support afterwards. As a standing arrangement it undermines the permanent leader's authority and should be avoided — if they need that much support, the hire was wrong.
Keep reading
Related pages
Talk it through before you commit budget
Thirty minutes is usually enough to tell whether India is a real opportunity for your category, what the sensible first step is, and what it should cost. No deck, no preamble.